City attorneys at the planning board meeting expressed their concern regarding the on-the-fly interpretation to the building issues and density considerations. Citizens seem to think that
the master plan is devoid of any covenant that checks developments. A city council member expressed his cynical disdain for citizens’ efforts to curtail density by 4% as being dishonest and amounting only to lip service. The same council member does not know what the 4% means while the debate rages on as to what rights apply to whom. Namely, can the city allow any development for the good of the community or is there a permanent,
inalienable right of property owners to do whatever they please based on how the property was zoned when it was purchased. The chairperson of the planning committee addresses the council with concerns on how long term designs are being overridden willy-nilly by the committee without reconsideration by engineers.
And then of course there is Amerikapitalism. Yes, it too has infested Marco Island. Greed is good under the ruse that what is good for business is good for the community. For those 8 people that continue to believe this hoax, may they live out the rest of their life in oblivious peace by not coming across any information on Enron, Viacom, Tyco, WorldCom, Arthur Anderson and the wonders of Al Dunlap’s “Profit at Any Price” business model.
And here? A council member is the real estate industry. A pizza parlor makes a petition to make last minute changes to a huge engineering project just so it and its business neighbors can purportedly be better accessed by … ready for this one … by the citizens that would otherwise jaywalk. The petition prevails despite every citizen and the planning board opposing the change. The fact that the businesses wanting to make the change never attended a planning meeting is irrelevant. A hotel chain argues over density by calling whatever it is they are planning to build whatever it needs to be called so that the planning board can somehow apply the “voodoo” – yes, that was the word that was used – of the density algorithm since a condo is considered differently than a hotel suite which is considered differently than a timeshare which is considered differently than a “vacation unit” – whatever that means. A “hospice” business wants to do its civic duty by proposing to build a hospice facility on property deeded for a hospital. Very nice – except that the majority of the units are for “unassisted” living – predominantly for their workers. And the list goes on and on and on.
As one polite citizen eloquently stated while addressing the city council, “Marco Island – Commercial Enterprise; Business Over Citizens”. Amerikapitalism.
Consider that unbridled development is antithetical to the notion of a community. Lest anyone doubt this fact look no further than 90 miles to the east. A community is made up of PEOPLE and their families and their relations – and is NOT made up of its businesses. Marco Island is unique in this respect – where else can so many young children be blessed by growing up in such close proximity to their grandparents and their friends? Considering the pathetic record and promise of our public school systems (with the possible exception of TB as a good though not great school), where better can our children learn about their culture and their family history and their traditions than from the “older” generation? Not from chat rooms or cell phones or schools or eating at the local pizza joint or renting a whatever-its-called-room from a hotel chain – that’s for sure.
Growth for greed will kill this community as sure as it did Miami and scores of other “communities”. We can not afford the problems associated with congestion, limited infrastructure, and the associative problems given that the direct consequence of these avoidable ills is the moral and financial expulsion of the people that make up the community. We are even fighting amongst ourselves in the Tartarus that is the legal system in part because some citizens believe that the sewage treatment plant will not be able to handle the sewage that will flow from the new sewer systems that are being put in place in part to handle the … growth.
Is anyone comfortable with how growth is managed? Clearly not. When it comes to growth, the few nice people on the council appear to be a hagiarchy. The other members are clearly a corpocracy. The city council is not only “uncomfortable” – their words – with the density/growth issue, heck, they don’t even understand it. How is it possible to manage something you don’t understand? You can’t.
With no clear vision of where we are headed, or how even to get there, we are doomed to fight amongst ourselves all the while the commercialization of our area rolls on unabated.
Let’s stop this farce. Let’s stop selling out our community. Let’s get a handle on what density means. Lets know what are the near and long term ramifications of ANY business and commercial growth. Let the planning board and the staff and the citizens and the lawyers and the good folks at MICA – and yes even the businesses – come together to formulate a near and long term strategy. A strategy that is effectuated via a clear plan. A plan that is understood even by the most cynical and by the most ardent profiteers.
We can preserve a community. The community can prosper. Those are the first mandates of a society. Businesses can too survive – within the will of the community. Yes, for those council members that don’t yet understand eminent domain and the interplay of city ordinances, it is the will of the citizens of a republic that dictate what can or can not happen. If that were not the case, brothels and strip joints and adult stores would be next to every … pizza parlor.
Marco Island needs to seriously consider a temporary moratorium on development.
Any independent, citizen-oriented leader up to the challenge?
1 Comments:
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to sewage treatment and disposal systems;
3 amending s. 153.54, F.S.; requiring county commissions to
4 include certain studies for the construction of a new
5 proposed sewerage system or the extension of an existing
6 sewerage system in certain reports; amending s. 153.73,
7 F.S.; requiring county water and sewer districts to
8 conduct certain studies for the construction of a new
9 proposed sewerage system or the extension of an existing
10 sewerage system prior to the levying of certain
11 assessments; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; authorizing local
12 governments to use certain onsite sewage treatment and
13 disposal systems to meet certain concurrency requirements;
14 amending s. 180.03, F.S.; requiring municipalities to
15 conduct certain studies for the construction of a new
16 proposed sewerage system or the extension of an existing
17 sewerage system prior to the adoption of certain
18 resolutions or ordinances; amending s. 381.00655, F.S.;
19 authorizing local governments and certain water and sewer
20 districts to grant variances from connecting to a publicly
21 owned or investor-owned sewerage system under certain
22 circumstances; providing construction; amending s.
23 381.0067, F.S.; authorizing the department or its agents
24 to require repair or replacement of drainfields under
25 certain circumstances; requiring the department or its
26 agents to issue an order for the replacement of an onsite
27 sewage treatment and disposal system under certain
28 circumstances; providing construction; amending s.
29 489.554, F.S.; increasing annual continuing education
30 requirements for septic tank contractors and master septic
31 tank contractors; providing an effective date.
32
33 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
34
35 Section 1. Subsection (5) is added to section 153.54,
36 Florida Statutes, to read:
37 153.54 Preliminary report by county commissioners with
38 respect to creation of proposed district.--Upon receipt of a
39 petition duly signed by not less than 25 qualified electors who
40 are also freeholders residing within an area proposed to be
41 incorporated into a water and sewer district pursuant to this
42 law and describing in general terms the proposed boundaries of
43 such proposed district, the board of county commissioners if it
44 shall deem it necessary and advisable to create and establish
45 such proposed district for the purpose of constructing,
46 establishing or acquiring a water system or a sewer system or
47 both in and for such district (herein called "improvements"),
48 shall first cause a preliminary report to be made which such
49 report together with any other relevant or pertinent matters,
50 shall include at least the following:
51 (5) For the construction of a new proposed sewerage system
52 or the extension of an existing sewerage system that was not
53 previously approved, the report shall include a study that
54 includes the available information from the Department of Health
55 on the history of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems
56 currently in use in the area and a comparison of the projected
57 costs to the owner of a typical lot or parcel of connecting to
58 and using the proposed sewerage system versus installing,
59 operating, and properly maintaining an onsite sewage treatment
60 system that is approved by the Department of Health and that
61 provides for the comparable level of environmental and health
62 protection as the proposed central sewerage system;
63 consideration of the local authority's obligations or reasonably
64 anticipated obligations for water body cleanup and protection
65 under state or federal programs, including requirements for
66 water bodies listed under s. 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, Pub.
67 L. No. 92-500, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq.; and other factors
68 deemed relevant by the local authority.
69 Such report shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the
70 circuit court and shall be open for the inspection of any
71 taxpayer, property owner, qualified elector or any other
72 interested or affected person.
73 Section 2. Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (2) of
74 section 153.73, Florida Statutes, to read:
75 153.73 Assessable improvements; levy and payment of
76 special assessments.--Any district may provide for the
77 construction or reconstruction of assessable improvements as
78 defined in s. 153.52, and for the levying of special assessments
79 upon benefited property for the payment thereof, under the
80 provisions of this section.
81 (2)
82 (c) For the construction of a new proposed sewerage system
83 or the extension of an existing sewerage system that was not
84 previously approved, the report shall include a study that
85 includes the available information from the Department of Health
86 on the history of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems
87 currently in use in the area and a comparison of the projected
88 costs to the owner of a typical lot or parcel of connecting to
89 and using the proposed sewerage system versus installing,
90 operating, and properly maintaining an onsite sewage treatment
91 system that is approved by the Department of Health and that
92 provides for the comparable level of environmental and health
93 protection as the proposed central sewerage system;
94 consideration of the local authority's obligations or reasonably
95 anticipated obligations for water body cleanup and protection
96 under state or federal programs, including requirements for
97 water bodies listed under s. 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, Pub.
98 L. No. 92-500, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq.; and other factors
99 deemed relevant by the local authority.
100 Section 3. Paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of section
101 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
102 163.3180 Concurrency.--
103 (2)(a) Consistent with public health and safety, sanitary
104 sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water supplies, and
105 potable water facilities shall be in place and available to
106 serve new development no later than the issuance by the local
107 government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
108 equivalent. Prior to approval of a building permit or its
109 functional equivalent, the local government shall consult with
110 the applicable water supplier to determine whether adequate
111 water supplies to serve the new development will be available no
112 later than the anticipated date of issuance by the local
113 government of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
114 equivalent. A local government may meet the concurrency
115 requirement for sanitary sewer through the use of onsite sewage
116 treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department of
117 Health to serve new development.
118 Section 4. Subsection (3) is added to section 180.03,
119 Florida Statutes, to read:
120 180.03 Resolution or ordinance proposing construction or
121 extension of utility; objections to same.--
122 (3) For the construction of a new proposed sewerage system
123 or the extension of an existing sewerage system that was not
124 previously approved, the report shall include a study that
125 includes the available information from the Department of Health
126 on the history of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems
127 currently in use in the area and a comparison of the projected
128 costs to the owner of a typical lot or parcel of connecting to
129 and using the proposed sewerage system versus installing,
130 operating, and properly maintaining an onsite sewage treatment
131 system that is approved by the Department of Health and that
132 provides for the comparable level of environmental and health
133 protection as the proposed central sewerage system;
134 consideration of the local authority's obligations or reasonably
135 anticipated obligations for water body cleanup and protection
136 under state or federal programs, including requirements for
137 water bodies listed under s. 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, Pub.
138 L. No. 92-500, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251 et seq.; and other factors
139 deemed relevant by the local authority. The results of such a
140 study shall be included in the resolution or ordinance required
141 under subsection (1).
142 Section 5. Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (2) of
143 section 381.00655, Florida Statutes, to read:
144 381.00655 Connection of existing onsite sewage treatment
145 and disposal systems to central sewerage system; requirements.--
146 (2) The provisions of subsection (1) or any other
147 provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding:
148 (c) A local government or water and sewer district
149 responsible for the operation of a centralized sewer system
150 under s. 153.62 may grant a variance to an owner of a
151 performance-based onsite sewage treatment and disposal system
152 permitted by the department as long as the onsite system is
153 functioning properly and satisfying the conditions of the
154 operating permit. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed
155 to require a local government or water and sewer district to
156 issue a variance under any circumstance. Nothing in this
157 paragraph shall be construed as limiting local government
158 authority to enact ordinances under s. 4 of chapter 99-395, Laws
159 of Florida. A local government or water and sewer district
160 located in any of the following areas shall not be required to
161 issue a variance under any circumstance:
162 1. An area of critical state concern.
163 2. An area that was designated as an area of critical
164 state concern for at least 20 consecutive years prior to removal
165 of the designation.
166 3. An area in the South Florida Water Management District
167 west C-11 basin that discharges through the S-9 pump into the
168 Everglades.
169 4. An area designated by the Lake Okeechobee Protection
170 Act.
171 Section 6. Section 381.0067, Florida Statutes, is amended
172 to read:
173 381.0067 Corrective orders; private and certain public
174 water systems and onsite sewage treatment and disposal
175 systems.--When the department or its agents, through
176 investigation, find that any private water system, public water
177 system not covered or included in the Florida Safe Drinking
178 Water Act (part VI of chapter 403), or onsite sewage treatment
179 and disposal system constitutes a nuisance or menace to the
180 public health or significantly degrades the groundwater or
181 surface water, the department or its agents it may issue an
182 order requiring the owner to correct the improper condition. If
183 the improper condition relates to the drainfield of an onsite
184 sewage treatment and disposal system, the department or its
185 agents may issue an order requiring the owner to repair or
186 replace the drainfield. If an onsite sewage treatment and
187 disposal system has failed, the department or its agents shall
188 issue an order requiring the owner to replace the system. For
189 purposes of this section, an onsite sewage treatment and
190 disposal system has failed if the operation of the system
191 constitutes a nuisance or menace to the public health or
192 significantly degrades the groundwater or surface water and the
193 system cannot be repaired.
194 Section 7. Subsection (2) of section 489.554, Florida
195 Statutes, is amended to read:
196 489.554 Registration renewal.--
197 (2) At a minimum, annual renewal shall include continuing
198 education requirements of not less than 12 6 classroom hours
199 annually for septic tank contractors and not less than 18 12
200 classroom hours annually for master septic tank contractors. The
201 18 12 classroom hours of continuing education required for
202 master septic tank contractors may include the 12 6 classroom
203 hours required for septic tank contractors, but at a minimum
204 must include 6 classroom hours of approved master septic tank
205 contractor coursework.
206 Section 8. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006.
By Mario R. Sanchez, Ph.D., at Friday, June 30, 2006 1:20:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home