Haunting & Hunting the Marco Island Syndicate

October 26, 2017

Mr. Scott Pruitt
USEPA Headquarters
William Jefferson Clinton Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Mail Code: 1101A
Washington, DC 20460

Dear Mr. Pruitt,

On October 16, 2017 in an interview with Neil Cavuto (Fox News[1]), when he asked/stated that “Administrator Pruitt doesn’t want these laws enforced” you responded

“Look, I'm a former attorney general. I led a grand jury. I know what it means to prosecute folks. We have already begun the process to prosecute individuals in many cases across the country …”

Your answer suggests that you are serious in upholding the law, in pursuing violations. Presuming your integrity to put into action what you are publicly claiming, we are respectfully requesting that you prosecute the City of Marco Island, Florida.

From 2006 to 2009, the City of Marco Island (COMI) pulverized asbestos pipe into the air not 1 mile from a school – violating the Clean Air Act. When confronted of this illegal act the COMI buried the asbestos pipe. When also confronted of this illegal act, the COMI then properly disposed of what was left (very little) of the asbestos pipe.

Despite the EPA being aware, in fact witnessing the crimes, no one was prosecuted.

At the same time, the COMI discharged millions of gallons of toxic effluent into Southwest Florida protected waterways, including the Gulf of Mexico – violating the Clean Water Act. As the effluent was being discharged many citizens were being harmed by the noxious effects of hydrogen sulfide gas that was being released by the waste water. What is most disturbing about this fact is that criminal investigators from the EPA were on the island and witnessed this crime.

As noted, both of these crimes were known to the EPA as they were occurring. To this day a website exists documenting these crimes (marcoislandblog.blogspot.com). My Freedom of Information Act suit against the EPA further proves this fact – as the released records from the EPA have all of these crimes well documented.

For both of these crimes, a “settlement” was reached where … nothing happened. The EPA decided on its own to “settle” on terms and conditions that are not in law, not in statutes, on rules that the agency made up on the fly – in essence not doing what by law the EPA was legally obligated to do. 

The EPA applied the very arbitrary political expediency that you decry in the above noted interview:

“That's a subversion of the rule-making process. It's called sue and settle and regulation through litigation. And any agency of the federal government that engages in substantive rule-making through the judicial process is abusing their authority under the statute. And that's what we ended yesterday.”

Therefore, as you have publicly stated, we respectfully demand\ that you, the EPA, enforce the laws as related to the crimes committed by the City of Marco Island.

---

[1] http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/10/17/epa-administrator-scott-pruitt-on-rolling-back-regulations.html

Here is Why - Part II

As proffered in the previous article, institutionalized, political and governmental corruption is the direct cause of the injustices performed at the local level against those of no means, those not of the ilk that is the establishment, those that are simply not liked. Local lawyers, judges and governments are the seat of the criminality that infests and permeates this country. 

As Mark Levin said last week when decrying the illegalities by the FBI, by Congress, by judges, by …, "We have widespread lawlessness".

As but one example here is a case that occurred not too long ago right here in your own Collier County. One day an ex-wife, two years after receiving everything in a divorce ... house, all money, retirement, all assets ... schleps into the Florida Department of Revenue office and claims that she has not received the alimony she was entitled to. Without a hearing, without a trial, without due process, mainly violating the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution the ex-husband's salary is seized - and seized for the ensuing two years.

Consider the significance of what happened here (verifiable by those so interested) ... anyone can fill out a form, the form need not be judged or adjudicated or validated in any way, and the State acts on it unilaterally by seizing a man's salary.

Attempts to address the issue at the Collier County Court went on for nearly two years. Lies were told, documents withheld, witnesses tampered with, discovery adulterated, money laundered, fraud perfected on the court … not only by the ex but by her attorney. All leading to the destruction of a man and the relationship with his children. The Court, buddy-buddy with the misandrist attorney for the ex, refused to let the obvious and the written word and common sense deter the bigotry - in fact, the Court encouraged the racism.  Even the man's military service, for which he receives disability, was openly mocked in court, ridiculed,  denigrated, all as his highness the good ol' boy Collier County judge smirked in accepting silence.

The lies begot bigger lies, the fraud begot bigger frauds, and both created a false basis by which everything else followed. Not dissimilar to how half the country still believes that another albeit more renown liar is the smartest woman in the world (despite losing a presidential election to a vulgarian neophyte, despite leaving an ambassador and four others to die, despite giving away the country's uranium so her rapist husband could earn obscene speaking fees, despite violating the Espionage Act, despite ...)

And does anyone still wonder why criminals are free to live their lives not only unscathed but in open mockery of the clearly putrefied legal "system"? As with all attorneys and judges - yes, all, (the “I was just a guard at Auschwitz” defense was ruled invalid by the Criminal Court at The Hague) - "Now all of the criminals in their coats and their ties are free to drink Martini's and watch the sunrise." (Bob Dylan).

In another nearly identical case to this, but different because this other man had the means to appeal and appeal and appeal, a federal judge overturned a local Collier County-ish Court ruling with these words:

The extensive record clearly demonstrates that petitioner's convictions were predicated upon an appeal to racism rather than reason, and concealment rather than disclosure. Were it not for these grave constitutional violations, the court concludes, for the reasons hereafter set forth, the guilty verdicts of the jury might well have been otherwise. However, this court is convinced that a conviction which rests upon racial stereotypes, fears and prejudices violates rights too fundamental to permit deference to stand in the way of the relief sought. It would be naive not to recognize that some prejudice, bias and fear lurks in all of us. But to permit a conviction to be urged based upon such factors or to permit a conviction to stand having utilized such factors diminishes our fundamental constitutional rights.

Sit silently, let the criminals escape justice, and wait until they come for you.