 |
|
On Marco Island: Independent Reporting, Documenting Government Abuses, Exposing the Syndicate, Historical Records of Crimes Against the Environment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
||||
 Click this BIG button for ... All the evidence in one place! The documentation in pictures, documents and video of what was done to Marco Island .. and more! |
||||
Take this 60-second on-line poll – your opinion counts! All voting goes directly to the City Council.
Also, to see the results of the poll so far, CLICK HERE TO SEE THE RESULTS SO FAR
Pass the word – who will pay the fine is important! Do you want to pay?
posted by Mario R. Sanchez, Ph.D. at
10:15 PM
|
Number of Comments: 2
CLICK HERE TO VIEW&POST COMMENTS
|
HOW TO POST A COMMENT At the end of every article, there is a "CLICK HERE TO VIEW POST COMMENTS" link. Click this link to view and to add your comments to that article. Its that simple! If you want to post a feature article - an article that will appear on this main page - email it to marcoislandblog@DBIQ.com and it will be posted. These articles must have your full (and real) name! |
Where opinions, views and insights about Marco Island Florida are shared!
The Marco Island Blog strongly supports the cityhood of Marco Island, having its own police, fire and emergency services, its own public works, its community and park initiatives, having its own government and much much more.
This blog is an OPEN forum. Not one comment is moderated, all postings are welcomed, all submissions have been posted.
Progress and consensus are derived solely from communicating with those that don't agree with you. It comes by putting out your ideas and opinions for everyone to see and thereby making them available to be contradicted, criticized and condemned. Let the ideas and opinions pass or fail on their own merit as adjudicated by the rigors of a populace debate.
That practice is the foundation of a successful democracy. And that is the purpose of this blog.
This blog also stands for democratic, federalist and Jeffersonian principles, is against the abuse of government, and stands for the free publications of all views.
It is the duty - the obligation - of every citizen to question, inspect and critique the actions of government. Such is one of the basic tenets of a democracy.
"I am for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents." Thomas Jefferson
As we are.
2 Comments:
Who Should Pay EPA Fine for Asbestos Contamination?
In as much as Quality Enterprise knew or should have known just what the procedures were for handling asbestos, it is my opinion that QE and QE alone should be held responsible for all costs incurred for the improper handling and disposal of asbestos.
As to the city officials and employees; the employment of any city employee, still working for the city, that were in any official way involved in the handling or disposal of the asbestos should be terminated.
All elected city officials presently in office should be recalled for nonfeasance and malfeasance regarding this asbestos matter. All councilors, past and present, were neglect and are still neglect in their duties to protect the citizens of Marco Island.
Of courses this opinion presupposes that the EPA finds quilt in the disposal and handling of the asbestos.
Thank you for your efforts Mario.
By
Anonymous, at Monday, May 24, 2010 12:08:00 PM
thank you and i agree.
my rationale for including the city councilors is predicated on the argument that each of them KNEW that what QE and moss and joel was wrong and outright illegal. the city councilors were informed in council meetings in the newspaper via myriad emails. but instead of halting the practice (or at least stopped until there was an independent review) they denigrated slurred libeled and slandered those of us that brought the illegal acts to their attention. only kiester and froscht spoke out consistently against the asbestos dumping (and the lethal levels of hydrogen sulfide contamination of the city). the others were too busy being corrupt or too busy being stupid (stupidity is not a defense).
according to florida law these actions by city councilors denies their protection under sovereign immunity.
so both for ethical and legal reasons the councilors were included in who should pay.
but you are correct - QE was the actual perpetrator
By
Daring to Speak, at Monday, May 24, 2010 12:26:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home