Hitler Discusses How to Rig Another Election on Marco Island

Back by popular demand, Hitler - the Syndicate Fuhrer - discusses how the syndicate is going to rig yet another election for city council on Marco Island.

Enjoy.

(best viewed in HD - so expand to FULL SCREEN!)

Remembering a Marco Island Hero

Which person of integrity cannot forget how our friend and hero Robert Glaub was despicably treated by the syndicate when he was removed from the podium at a city council meeting for exercising his First Amendment right.

Well, there is another corrupt city in America that is following the dishonest trend of the City Council of Marco Island ... its appears that when We The People speak against municipal corruption, malfeasance and syndicates throughout America, we get sued or escorted by the police out of a council meeting ...

RIVERSIDE (CBSLA.com) — A Riverside woman is facing misdemeanor charges following her arrest for speaking too long at a Riverside City Council meeting, the Riverside Press-Enterprisereported Thursday.
Karen Wright, whose arrest was videotaped and obtained by the paper, was cited for disrupting a public meeting Tuesday night.
“The incident unfolded after Wright exceeded her allotted three minutes to speak at the lectern while commenting on a sludge hauling contract,” the paper reported.
Wright, 60, was initially handcuffed by two officers while she was on her knees.
In video of the incident, Wright can be heard yelling in pain as officers tried to bring her to her feet.
“Can you see my wrists? You’re pulling and jerking on my wrists!” she said. “I cannot get up without putting my hands down!”
Wright was later led out of the building.
“City officials said officers used their discretion when Wright didn’t follow the rules,” according to the Press-Enterprise. Council members deny ordering her arrest.
An unidentified meeting spectator can also be heard in the background of the video: “Are you guys kidding me? . . . Stop!”
Another person can be heard saying, “This is your legacy, Mayor. Your legacy.”
Wright was given a citation with a date to appear in court.
Riverside Mayor Ron Loveridge, who has been presiding over the City Council for 32, said the incident was the first time he had seen anyone arrested during one of their meetings. He said that police will no longer be able to arrest speakers unless the council chairman — which is the mayor — directs them to do so.
City Council meetings are typically recorded and the video posted on the city website, but Tuesday’s incident was not caught on camera; that’s because Loveridge called a recess when police intervened and the video camera is typically turned off during council recesses.

Recommendations for Marco Island City Council

As the only legitimate newspaper on Marco Island, the Marco Island Blog proudly makes the following recommendations for Marco Island City Council.

VOTE FOR any candidate that has never spoken to, knows, or has ever come in direct or indirect contact with any of the following “people” or entities:

·         John Arceri

·         Monte Lazarus

·         Ed Issler

·         Glenn Tucker

·         Mike Minozzi

·         Bill Trotter

·         Tarik Ayasun

·         Craig Woodard

·         Arnon Joel (aka “Rony” Joel)

·         Bill Moss

·         Jerry Gibson

·         Wayne Walduck

·         Larry Magel

·         MICA / Marco Island Realtors / Marco Island Chamber of Commerce /

·         Any condo homeowners’ association

DO NOT VOTE FOR any candidate that has spoken to, knows, or has ever come in direct or indirect contact with any of the following “people” or entities:

·     
   John Arceri

·         Monte Lazarus

·         Ed Issler

·         Glenn Tucker

·         Mike Minozzi

·         Bill Trotter

·         Tarik Ayasun

·         Craig Woodard

·         Arnon Joel (aka “Rony” Joel)

·         Bill Moss

·         Jerry Gibson

·         Wayne Walduck

·         Larry Magel

·         MICA / Marco Island Realtors / Marco Island Chamber of Commerce /

·         Any condo homeowners’ association

And we look forward to another election dominated by the syndicate’s corrupt voting mechanisms of bullet voting, getting everyone in a condo association to fill out their mail-ballot the same, voting physically while using an absentee ballot, etc …

Another Syndicate Wins Noble Peace Prize

In keeping with the sheer senselessness exhibited by the Noble Peace Prize Committee that prostituted Alfred Noble’s vision of the award by “giving” the once esteemed prize to people and entities that do everything but promote peace and fight for peace and risk everything for peace and even are tortured for the sake of peace we are once again asked and arguably forced to succumb to yet another dumbing of our senses most notable of which is our intellectual acumen by the befalling of awarding this year’s Noble Peace Prize upon on a bureaucratic power-hungry oligopolistic-kakistocracy shill for mega banks and big business that has done more to harm the people that are within its expanse than the wars in that very same area has experienced for quite some  time.

So the European Union – that has a war machine deployed (a war machine gets the Peace Prize?) and has ensured the destitution of millions of its own citizens – hey, just like the syndicate on Marco Island! – gets recognized for being as peaceful. Yes, an award now with no value other than the comic relief afforded, akin to the syndicate and its operatives on Marco Island receiving the citizen of the year award or some other vacuous recognition by the local non-newspapers.

What a farce this once legendary and prestigious award has become –just like what Marco Island has become despite having been not too long ago a great and fiscally sound place.

With the Peace Prize having been awarded to another fraud Al Gore – despite a plethora of other people nominated that actually did something for peace – as opposed to promote environmentalism with fraudulent data so they can exploit fear and hence directly profit (hey, just like the Marco Island syndicate and “there be fecal in them there waterways!”) the Noble Prize is but a joke.

With the Peace Prize having been awarded to another fraud Barrack Hussein Obama – despite a plethora of other people nominated that actually did something for peace – as opposed saddle generations with debt (hey, just like the Marco Island syndicate and the $400million+ unnecessary sewer system) the Noble Prize is but a joke.

Below is but one of the many world-wide condemnations of this year’s award. Simply replace “European Union” (“EU”) with “Marco Island Syndicate” and you will see that it’s all one and the same.

-o-o-(source: RT News).

First the EU, next Frankenstein? Nobel Committee’s decision ‘farcical’ – RT’s Max Keiser

The Nobel Committee had a more legitimate choice for its Peace Prize in “Bill Clinton’s left testicle” than the EU, RT’s Max Kaiser said. Kaiser slammed the award as honoring a technocracy that impoverishes its citizens to feed monstrous banks.

RT:The EU has won for its role in uniting the continent – but at a time of rising separatism and the economy in a slump, how do you explain that?

Max Keiser: This is the rise of the machine. This is a machine selection that chose a machine. The EU is a technocracy governed by machines, joined with the banking establishment to suck wealth from the citizens of the EU and send it to Brussells and the banksters and sent it to the World Bank and the EU and the Troika. This is the rise of the machines, it’s farcical. They could’ve given the prize to Bill Clinton’s left testicle and it would have been more legitimate than giving it to a technocratic monstrosity. 

This is like giving the prize to Frankenstein for being the best monster created during the past 12 months. Where do they go from here? Who are they going to give it to next? They are going to give it to a genetically modified seed in India where farmers are killing themselves by the thousands because of companies like Monsanto. Give it to Monsanto next year, Nobel Committee! I mean your track record for giving this prize to warmongers, banksters and corporate fascists is becoming quite impressive.

RT: Will this award give any kind of economic boost to the Union and help it out of the pit it’s in?

MK: No, absolutely not. They want to create a new super-bank take power from the ECB, run it out of Brussels and impose a new debt-for-junk scheme, rolling up all the toxic debt into a new super European Central Bank to impose more austerity and pilfer more money from the citizens. The direction this is going is absolutely catastrophic. Christine Lagarde, I’m sure she’ll get the Nobel Prize next year for having caused another 100 million people to go into poverty and another few hundred people to commit suicide. Let’s give it to Christine Lagarde, she’s a warmongering genocidal maniac, give her the Peace Prize!

RT: How do we balance the Peace Prize with the EU's interventions in Libya, EU members on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan and its support for the armed opposition in Syria?

MK: There is only one contender for the Peace Prize this year and it is Julian Assange. The fact that he did not win this prize will be an eternal stain on the Nobel Committee. No one has done more to push peace than Julian Assange, he should be getting the award from this committee. The fact that they’ve turned to a bunch of machines and technocrats in the EU is an embarrassment. They should go back to making dynamite, which is how the Nobel Prize Committee got started. Go back to making dynamite and forget about this Peace Prize. You’re illegitimate, you’ve embarrassed yourselves, just fold. Commit suicide for a change, instead of encouraging people in Greece to commit suicide!

No Surprise to Some on Marco Island: EPA Harms People

Not counting the idiotic hubris by the syndicate operatives - like the one buffoon that offered to eat or inhale or inject the dirt and prove that there was no asbestos, every sentient person knew that the asbestos being crushed on Marco Island was and will harm people.

The EPA was notified early on that there was illegal asbestos crushing on the island - as proven by the documents produced because of the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The EPA refused to intervene and thereby refused to protect the health of the public. The EPA mistakenly believed that the complicit Florida Department of Environmental Protection would stop the harmful process. When the FDEP showed that they were in on the gig, the EPA finally stepped in. Too late.

Same story with the gassing of entire neighborhoods when the City of Marco Island violated the Clean Water Act.

Over 900 people sought medical attention as entire neighborhoods were succumbed to toxic levels of hydrogen sulfide gas. The EPA was well aware of the illegal practice (as was the FDEP who did nothing more but to write a letter) but chose to rely on the City spin not least of which was from the ever-absent "environmental specialist."

So now it is no surprise that the EPA has been found to have intentionally and directly harmed people. Based on another Freedom of Information Act demand, documents show that the EPA uses humans as guineas pigs.

Marco Island has been joined in infamy by this gruesome story of being EPA victims.

Enjoy.

(from: http://junkscience.com/2012/10/05/epa-admits-to-court-human-subjects-may-die-from-air-pollution-experiments/#more-31782)
----------

EPA admits to Court: Human subjects ‘may die’ from air pollution experiments

Posted on October 5, 2012 by Steve Milloy | 21 Comments

EPA has admitted to a federal court that it asks human guinea pigs to sacrifice their lives for regulatory purposes — and $12 per hour.
EPA has responded to our emergency motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against its ongoing human experiment (called “CAPTAIN”) involving the air pollutant known as PM_2.5.
In the declaration of Martin W. Case, the EPA clinical research studies coordinator for CAPTAIN, Case claims he verbally warns study subjects before the experiment as follows:

… My first approach after being introduced to the subject by the medical station staff is to ask the subject if they have read the consent form. The subjects for CAPTAIN have been given the informed study consent form on a previous visit, and, they are also given the same consent to read again if they have not read the consent the day of the training…
I provide participants with information about fine particles (PM2.s). I say that PM2.s are particles so small that they are able past through your airways and go deep into your lungs, these particles are so small that your usual lining and cilia of your airways are not able to prevent these particles from passing into your lungs, Therefore, if you are a person that for example lives in a large city like Los Angeles or New York, and it’s been a very hot day, and you can see the haze in the air, and you happen to be someone that works outside, and if you have an underlying unknown health condition, or, you may be older in age; the chances are that you could end up in the emergency room later on that night, wondering what’s wrong, possibly having cardiac changes that could lead to a heart attack; there is the possibility you may die from this…

Here’s the analysis of Case’s remarkable admission — that is, if we can even rely on Case’s declaration:

1. Prohibition on human sacrifice. Every law, regulation and code developed since World War II strictly prohibits human sacrifice (i.e.,significant injury or death) for no health benefit to the patient (the wage of $12 per hour does not count as a “benefit”). EPA employee Case explicitly admits in this declaration that short-term exposure to PM_2.5can be lethal.And though Case attempts to distance this warning from the experiment by explaining the risk in terms of a person living “in a large city like Los Angeles or New York”, EPA states in its IRB application for approval of CAPTAIN, “The particle burden, on a mass basis presented to the volunteer will not exceed an exposure an individual receives over a 24 hour period while visiting a typical urban center in America on a smoggy day.” Moreover, EPA has repeatedly stated in numerous regulatory documents and public statements that there is no safe level of exposure to PM_2.5 and that any exposure to PM_2.5 can kill within hours or days.
2. Failure to obtain substantive informed consent. Despite Case’s admission that experimental exposure to PM_2.5 may cause death, according to the EPA-provided consent form given to study subjects, the risks of experimental exposure to PM_2.5 are only as follows:
   

   PM exposure: During the exposure to the concentrated air pollution particles, you may experience some minor degree of airway irritation, cough, and shortness of breath or wheezing. These symptoms typically disappear 2 to 4 hours after exposure, but may last longer for particularly sensitive people. You will be monitored continuously during the exposure session through a window in the chamber or by closed-circuit television, and can communicate with a staff member via an intercom. Your heart rate and rhythm will also be constantly monitored for any adverse changes brought about by the exposure. In the unlikely event that you develop medically significant symptoms, the exposure will be terminated and the appropriate medical intervention will be provided if required. A physician is always available on the premises to respond to an emergency and full resuscitation equipment is available for use in the event of a cardiac or pulmonary emergency.
   Air pollution particles may induce an inflammatory reaction that can last for 24 hours after exposure and may increase the chance of you catching a cold. You should not engage in heavy levels of exercise for 24 hours before and after the exposure period. If you have any tendency to become uncomfortable in small closed spaces, it is possible that you may become uncomfortable during the chamber exposure. Although the chamber is somewhat small, it has multiple windows and you will be in constant visual contact with the investigator who will be monitoring you during the exposure. You also will be able to verbally communicate with the investigator via a microphone headset.

   So in the place in the consent form where EPA is legally required to disclose to study subjects all the risks the experiment entails, EPA omits death, as well as all the dangers it mentioned to the institutional review board in the IRB application, including:
   

   Numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between acute and chronic exposure to ambient levels of particulate matter (PM) and various adverse cardiopulmonary effects including mortality, respiratory tract infection, exacerbation of asthma, chronic bronchitis, ischemic heart disease, and stroke (see review, (1)). A recent national scale epidemiological study has shown that short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) is associated with increased rates of hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory symptoms. The cardiovascular risk tended to be higher in the Eastern United States. This study also indicated a disproportionate risk among the elderly who are exposed to PM (2). Dietary factors such as intake of omega-3 fatty acids have been linked to human susceptibility to the adverse effects of ambient PM (14).Although air pollution exposure has long been known to be a risk factor for respiratory disease, over the last decade, a growing body of epidemiological studies has heightened concern over elevated rates of cardiovascular events related to both short-term and long-term exposure to PM (3). The risk of death from cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, and fatal arrhythmias) in response to chronically high levels of air pollution was much greater than that from lung disease (4-6). Short-term elevations in ambient PM levels are capable of evoking cardiac arrhythmias, worsening heart failure, and triggering acute atherosclerotic/ischemic cardiovascular complications, particularly in certain at-risk subsets of population (3). PM exposure can result in increases in heart rate, and decreases in heart rate variability (HRV; defined as changes in mean heart rate during 24 hrs, which is a reflection of autonomic tone on the heart (7). PM has been associated with transient increases in plasma viscosity (8), endothelial dysfunction (9) and acute-phase reactants (10, 11) such as C-reactive protein (12). Animal studies have suggested that long-term exposure to low concentration of PM altered vasomotor tone, induces vascular inflammation and potentiates atherosclerosis (13). Despite a decade of intensive studies, much about the PM health effects problem, especially the cardiovascular effect, is still not well understood. The present study is designed to test the hypothesis that genetic expression of the Phase II metabolizing enzyme GSTM1 alters the outcome of adverse responses
   to PM exposure.

3. Failure to provide/obtain written consent. The Common Rule, as codified in federal regulation 40 CFR 26.117, specifically requires that written informed consent be obtained when risk of serious injury or death is involved in an experiment. As the consent form provided by EPA makes no mention of the risk of death, written consent acknowledging that they are willing sacrifice themselves for EPA regulatory purposes is not obtained.